Facts about Oklahoma Citizen Petitions:
● Oklahoma has the highest per capita signature requirement of any U.S. state. (Oklahoma requires 172,993 signatures for a constitutional amendment petition).
● Oklahoma has the shortest time of any U.S. state to collect signatures (only 90 days). Ohio has no limit on signature collection. Arkansas has over six times that amount to collect signatures (20 months). ballotpedia.org
What’s Inside Senate Bill 1027?
● Oklahoma and Tulsa counties represent about 883,000 voters. Under SB 1027, no more than 10% of signatures may come from each of these counties. Only 34,598 of 883,000 Tulsa and OKC resident voters (4% of them) would be allowed to sign a petition, even though 36% of all registered voters in Oklahoma live there.
● Only 4% of signatures may be counted from smaller population counties. SB 1027 minimizes voices in mid-sized counties adjacent to larger metro areas.
● Oklahoma petitions routinely obtain signatures from every county. The most recent successful petition campaign collected signatures from all 77 counties.
● SB 1027 would require signature collectors to be OK-registered voters and mandates only in-state collection firms, which eliminates competitive pricing.
● The Secretary of State, a political appointee, would be given the power to reject petitions based on subjective language criteria.
Conclusions
● SB 1027 is an unprecedented attack on citizen engagement and would make it virtually impossible for many grassroots organizations to engage in the initiative petition process. No other state has implemented this level of burden on petitioners or petition signers.
● SB 1027 suppresses voters with addresses in and near larger population counties.
● SB 1027 is likely unconstitutional in violation of multiple state and federal laws.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 3, 2025
Oklahoma Legislature Moves to Make Citizen Ballot Initiatives Harder Than Ever
The Oklahoma Senate Judiciary Committee is set to hear SB 1027 on Tuesday, March 4, at 1:30 PM, a bill that would impose significant new restrictions on the citizen initiative petition process. If passed, SB 1027 would make it dramatically harder for Oklahomans to bring issues directly to a vote, undermining one of the most fundamental avenues for public participation in policymaking.
Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing Details:
Date: Tuesday, March 4, 2025
Time: 1:30 PM (or after the afternoon legislative session)
Location: Senate Room 4S9
SB 1027 would add new bureaucratic hurdles to the petition process, further restricting the ability of Oklahoma citizens to propose and vote on policies that matter to them.
These proposed changes include:
- Shifting authority away from the Oklahoma Supreme Court by giving the Secretary of State—a political appointee with no legal training—the power to reject initiative petitions based on subjective criteria.
- Requiring petition signers to provide additional attestations, including verifying they have read an entire ballot title, adding unnecessary barriers to participation.
- Effectively eliminating paid petition circulators in a state that already has the shortest signature-gathering window in the nation (90 days) by prohibiting per-signature compensation and requiring circulators to be Oklahoma residents.
- Mandating additional financial disclosures and reporting requirements
for grassroots organizations, making it more difficult for citizen-led movements to operate.
- Imposing unconstitutional limits on signature collection by capping the number of valid signatures per county, arbitrarily limiting voter participation and likely inviting costly taxpayer-funded litigation.
This latest attempt to restrict citizen petitions is part of a broader pattern of legislative efforts to weaken direct democracy in Oklahoma. Oklahoma already has one of the most difficult petition processes in the country, yet lawmakers continue to push for more restrictions that silence voters and limit public input.
Margaret Kobos, Founder of Oklahoma United, expressed serious concerns about SB 1027 and its implications for democracy in the state:
"Oklahoma citizens deserve more—not fewer—opportunities to participate in government and shape the policies that affect their daily lives. SB1027 will further erode public confidence in our government, which is already at record lows. The fact that this bill was quietly introduced late on a Friday and set for a hearing over the weekend, with little time for public awareness or input, shows a clear intent to suppress citizen participation rather than encourage it."
Kenneth Setter, a petitioner for State Question 836, said the bill represented a power grab meant to discourage civic engagement:
"SB 1027 and other bills like it are blatant attempts to shut down grassroots movements and silence the people. Instead of making it easier for citizens to engage in the democratic process, this legislature is working overtime to lock the people out."
Adding to these concerns, another bill on Tuesday’s agenda, SB 1119, would further restrict citizen petitions by requiring all signature gatherers to be Oklahoma residents. Given the state’s short timeline for gathering signatures and strict verification requirements, these restrictions would cripple grassroots efforts to qualify initiatives for the ballot.
SB 1027 has passed in the Oklahoma State Senate and is currently being considered in the House of Representatives. Here’s how you can help prevent this damaging bill from becoming law:
Subject: Please oppose SB 1027
Dear (Representative’s Name)
I’m writing as your constituent to urge you to oppose SB 1027. This bill would make it significantly harder for everyday Oklahomans like me to bring important issues to the ballot through the initiative petition process.
Oklahoma already has one of the most difficult petition systems in the country. SB 1027 adds even more unnecessary restrictions that would silence the voices of citizens and limit our ability to participate in our own democracy.
Please stand up for the rights of your constituents and vote no on SB 1027.
Sincerely,
YOUR NAME
YOUR ADDRESS
In such a system, only voters registered with a particular party may vote in that party’s primary election.*
*Oklahoma law allows each political party to decide each election cycle whether to let independents to vote in their primaries. At times, the Democratic Party has allowed independents to vote, but this is not guaranteed or the case every election cycle.
There are many types of open primary systems. We support a unified ballot system. In this type of election, all candidates, regardless of party, run on one primary ballot with their party affiliation listed by their name. All registered voters, regardless of their party, then vote for their preferred candidate. The two candidates receiving the most votes, regardless of party affiliation, move to the general election.
The current system is particularly unfair to independents, who make up 20 percent of the voting population and are in many cases completely disenfranchised or forced to join a political party. Similarly, Republicans in heavily Democratic areas or Democrats in heavily Republican areas are often robbed of the chance to cast a meaningful vote.
Government functions better when we lessen the influence of political insiders and encourage candidates to be responsive to the will of all their constituents.
Voter turnout is the sign of a healthy democracy. Unfortunately, Oklahoma ranks LAST in voter turnout compared to other states, owing to a system that discourages competitive races and disenfranchises hundreds of thousands of voters.
Concerned citizens can file an initiative petition with the Oklahoma Secretary of State. After a period for the public to review the filing, the proponents of the new state question will have 90 days to collect 172, 993 signatures (15 percent of the total votes cast for governor in 2022). If the proponents are successful, Governor Kevin Stitt will set a date for an election. At that point, Oklahomans will vote on whether to move the state to an open primary system.
Louisiana has a “one and done” system that eliminates primaries altogether. Louisianans vote only in November and if a candidate receives more than 50%, there is no subsequent match.
Our proposal is to keep primaries, keep party labels, let all voters vote, and assure there are two candidates in a contested general election.
In Nov. 2020 and Nov. 2024, Oklahoma’s voter participation rate was last in the nation. That’s indicative that something is seriously wrong with the way our democracy functions.
At least one nationally recognized expert on the U.S. Constitution said the bill's restrictions on the initiative process are unconstitutional. Robert McCampbell, an Oklahoma City attorney who specializes in constitutional law, wrote that the bill was unconstitutional.'
"The bill includes provisions that restrict petition circulators, prohibit out-of-state contributions, grant broad discretionary power to the secretary of state over citizen-initiated petitions, and retroactively change the procedure for initiative petitions. Each of these provisions conflicts with well-established legal precedent," McCampbell wrote in a four-page memo analyzing the measure.
The government, McCampbell said, is not free to "impose burdensome roadblocks to the citizen initiative process."
"The courts are unanimous that circulating a petition is 'core political speech' where First Amendment protection is at its 'zenith," he wrote. "The restrictions on core political speech embodied in SB 1027 cannot survive scrutiny under the First Amendment."
Other opponents of the bill, echoing McCampbell, said SB 1027 would "make it dramatically harder for Oklahomans to bring issues directly to a vote, undermining one of the most fundamental avenues for public participation in policymaking."
"(The) vote to advance SB 1027 is a disappointing step backward for democracy in Oklahoma. By making it harder for citizens to bring issues to the ballot, lawmakers are silencing the voices of everyday Oklahomans and limiting public participation in policymaking," said Margaret Kobos, founder of Oklahoma United. "The right to petition is fundamental to our state's history and this bill adds unnecessary barriers that will make it nearly impossible for grassroots efforts to succeed."
Former State Senator (Republican) AJ Griffin explains open primaries and State Question 836 before the CommonSense Club meeting in Shawnee.
"Oklahoma taxpayers pay for the current closed primary elections, which is unfair to the tens of thousands of voters who are unable to cast a ballot because they are of a different party or unaffiliated. This would stop the disenfranchisement.
Elections would focus more on the candidates and their views than on their parties. Candidates would not have to get the blessing of a political party for voters to consider them for office."
Pat McFerron with Yes on 835 joined The Hot Seat with News On 6 political analyst Scott Mitchell to discuss Oklahoma's low voter turnout in the Presidential election and how a reform of Oklahoma's primary system could boost voter turnout.
To address this issue, Mitchell's guest, Pat McFerron, discussed the efforts of the "Yes on 835" group to reform Oklahoma's primary system. McFerron explained, "We're going to get rid of the exclusionary Republican and Democrat primaries and create one ballot. It's basically, it's how every city, town, community in Oklahoma does it."
Oklahoma is dead last in voter participation.
Our mission is supported from real people from across Oklahoma.
Our mobile billboard cruised the state talking to voters about primary reform in Oklahoma.